Deshone Kizer entered the NFL in 2018 and quickly became a subject of intense analysis for scouts and fans. His college background at Notre Dame and limited pro experience make his statistics a useful lens for evaluating pocket presence and decision making.
Below you will find a detailed overview of Deshone Kizer stats, including structured performance metrics, career trends, and answers to common questions about his professional trajectory.
| Season | Team | Games Played | Completion % | TD Int Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2018 | Green Bay Packers | 4 | 46.2% | 0:1 |
| 2019 | Indianapolis Colts | 1 | 0.0% | 0:0 |
| 2020 | Saskatchewan Roughriders | 6 | 57.6% | 5:4 |
| 2021 | Houston Gamblers | 8 | 58.1% | 12:5 |
Physical Profile And Combine Data
Understanding Deshone Kizer stats begins with his physical profile, which influences how scouts interpret his performance metrics. Size, arm strength, and mobility shape the context behind each number in his career log.
Height Weight And Arm Length
At 6 feet 3 inches and 220 pounds, Kizer possesses the frame expected of a modern NFL quarterback. His reported 31.5 inch arms contribute to pocket presence and the ability to deliver throws on deeper routes.
College Performance Metrics
Deshone Kizer stats at Notre Dame provide a baseline for evaluating his NFL readiness. His college numbers show flashes of potential alongside the challenges of inconsistent offensive support.
2015 Season Snapshot
As a true starter, Kizer completed 175 of 301 passes for 2,074 yards, 12 touchdowns, and 6 interceptions, establishing a foundation of experience before entering the draft.
2016 And 2017 Contributions
Over two additional seasons, he added depth to the Notre Dame offense, managing workload distribution and demonstrating progress in pre-sense reads and pocket discipline.
Passing Efficiency And Decision Making
Deshone Kizer stats in professional leagues highlight his efficiency and turnover management. Evaluators focus on completion percentage, yards per attempt, and red zone decision making.
NFL Regular Season Lines
Across limited NFL action, his completion percentage hovered near the league average while maintaining a low interception rate per opportunity.
CFL And USFL Production
In the CFL and later the USFL, Kizer posted stronger touchdown to interception ratios, benefiting from schemes that emphasized intermediate throws and mobile pocket management.
How Performance Context Shapes Stats
Deshone Kizer stats must be read within system context, coaching quality, and health factors. These elements explain variations in his metrics from year to year and league to league.
Scheme Fit And Target Volume
Playing alongside different receivers and adjusting to varied offensive line units affected his numbers, emphasizing the importance of opportunity and support staff.
Health And Availability
Injuries and roster moves influenced his practice reps and game script, which in turn shaped observed efficiency metrics and career longevity.
Key Takeaways For Analysts And Fans
- Deshone Kizer stats are shaped heavily by system fit and health availability.
- His college production at Notre Dame offers a strong baseline for evaluating NFL and CFL transitions.
- Efficiency metrics improve when he operates within structured pocket passing schemes.
- Physical tools keep him competitive for niche roles in professional backfields.
- Contextual factors such as coaching, target quality, and offensive line performance explain year to year variations.
FAQ
Reader questions
How do Deshone Kizer stats compare to other late round quarterbacks?
His performance metrics show a similar completion percentage and turnover rate to other undrafted quarterbacks, with higher variance due to inconsistent opportunities.
What do his touchdown to interception ratios reveal?
Ratios improve in leagues that allow more calculated downfield throws, suggesting his decision making fits better in systems valuing intermediate concepts.
Why is his completion percentage relatively modest?
Limited target volume and varying offensive line quality contribute to a completion percentage that aligns more with pocket passer profiles than deep ball specialists.
How do scouts view his physical tools for an NFL return?
His size, arm strength, and mobility keep him relevant for short yardage and situational packages, even if starting opportunities remain limited.